Dear all,
Next week there will be no LIRa session, but you are invited to attend the *CELT2022 workshop*.
The workshop starts at 13h00 on Monday, Oct 24th and ends at 13h00 on Wednesday, Oct 26th.
For everyone: The *programme and the book of abstracts* are available online on the workshop website: https://easychair.org/cfp/CELT2022
For *online* participants: The entire workshop will be held in hybrid form, and we copy below the Zoom link of the event:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/87389907885
Meeting ID: 873 8990 7885
For *in-person* participants: The workshop will be held in room Nina van Leerzaal in Allard Pierson Museum in Amsterdam City Center. The easiest way to reach the conference room seems to be via the large gate at Oude Turfmarkt 141, 1012 GC Amsterdam. Someone from the organization team will be in front of this gate at 12h50 on Monday to walk you to the conference room.
The conference venue is easily accessible via metro and tram. The closest tram and metro stops are called Amsterdam Rokin and it takes about 2 min walk from these stops to the conference venue.
Please do not hesitate to contact the local organizers if you have any questions!
We are looking forward to seeing you all next week and have a great weekend,
CELT2022 organization team
PS: Those who already registered for the workshop might receive this message multiple times. Apologies for multiple copies in advance.
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 20 October 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Adam Bjorndhal
Date and Time: Thursday, October 20th 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: KdVI seminar room F3.20 in Science Park 107 and online.
Please note the unusual location. This is the Mathematics seminar
room, not the ILLC seminar room.
Title: Knowledge Second
Abstract. Classical philosophical analyses seek to explain knowledge
as deriving from more basic notions. The influential "knowledge first"
program in epistemology reverses this tradition, taking knowledge as
its starting point. From the perspective of epistemic logic, however,
this is not so much a reversal as it is the default—the field
arguably begins with the specialization of "necessity" to "epistemic
necessity"; that is, it begins with knowledge.
In this context, putting knowledge *second* would be the reversal.
This work motivates, develops, and explores such a "knowledge second"
approach in epistemic logic, founded on distinguishing what a body of
evidence actually entails from what it is (merely) believed to entail.
I import a logical framework that captures exactly this distinction
(based on previous, joint work with Aybüke Özgün), use it to define
formal notions of "internal" and "external" justification, and
investigate applications to the KK principle, the regress problem, and
the definition of knowledge
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 20 October 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Adam Bjorndhal
Date and Time: Thursday, October 20th 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: F3.20 and online.
Title: Knowledge Second
Abstract. Classical philosophical analyses seek to explain knowledge
as deriving from more basic notions. The influential "knowledge first"
program in epistemology reverses this tradition, taking knowledge as
its starting point. From the perspective of epistemic logic, however,
this is not so much a reversal as it is the default—the field
arguably begins with the specialization of "necessity" to "epistemic
necessity"; that is, it begins with knowledge.
In this context, putting knowledge *second* would be the reversal.
This work motivates, develops, and explores such a "knowledge second"
approach in epistemic logic, founded on distinguishing what a body of
evidence actually entails from what it is (merely) believed to entail.
I import a logical framework that captures exactly this distinction
(based on previous, joint work with Aybüke Özgün), use it to define
formal notions of "internal" and "external" justification, and
investigate applications to the KK principle, the regress problem, and
the definition of knowledge.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 6 October 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Lingyuan Ye
Date and Time: Thursday, October 6th 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: F1.15 and online.
Title: Unification of Semantics of Modal Logic via Topological
Categories
Abstract. In this talk we will provide a unifying description of
different types of semantics of modal logic found in the literature,
via topological categories. In particular, we will show how the
natural extensions of basic modal logic, including multi-agency,
epistemic dependence, group agency, and logical dynamics, could be
naturally associated to various semantic structures within topological
categories. The unifying description and such correspondence would
allow us to generalise the interpretation of these extensions
simultaneously to any semantics of modal logic, and prove certain
structural results about them in the style of categorical logic.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team