Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 31 October 16:30.
To attend, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Igor Sedlár (Czech Academy of Science)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 31st 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: online
Title: On the Dynamics of Dynamic Attitudes
Abstract. In events involving information updates, the source of the
update-causing information often determines how the information is
received and, consequently, what specific update different agents
undergo. Logics in which sources of update-causing information are
explicitly modelled, and in which agents' attitudes towards particular
pieces of information coming from particular sources are taken into
account, are relatively rare in the dynamic epistemic logic
literature. An example is provided by Rodenhäuser's logics of
information updates with dynamic attitudes, developed in his Ph.D.
thesis (ILLC, 2014).
We simplify and transpose Rodenhäuser's framework to the setting of
Public Announcement Logic, and extend it with mechanisms that
represent changes in agents' attitudes towards specific pieces of
information from specific sources - dynamics of dynamic attitudes. As
this is a work-in-progress talk and mostly programmatic, we focus on
examples and present only a handful of technical results, mostly
related to completeness via reduction axioms.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 31 October 16:30.
To attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Igor Sedlar (Czech Academy of Science)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 31st 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: online
Title: On the Dynamics of Dynamic Attitudes
Abstract. In events involving information updates, the source of the
update-causing information often determines how the information is
received and, consequently, what specific update different agents
undergo. Logics in which sources of update-causing information are
explicitly modelled, and in which agents' attitudes towards particular
pieces of information coming from particular sources are taken into
account, are relatively rare in the dynamic epistemic logic
literature. An example is provided by Rodenhäuser's logics of
information updates with dynamic attitudes, developed in his Ph.D.
thesis (ILLC, 2014).
We simplify and transpose Rodenhäuser's framework to the setting of
Public Announcement Logic, and extend it with mechanisms that
represent changes in agents' attitudes towards specific pieces of
information from specific sources - dynamics of dynamic attitudes. As
this is a work-in-progress talk and mostly programmatic, we focus on
examples and present only a handful of technical results, mostly
related to completeness via reduction axioms.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have a joint LIRa and DIP session
tomorrow, on Thursday, 24 October 16:30.
To attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
This will be a joint session together with the DIP Colloquium.
Speaker: Igor Douven (IHPST/CNRS/Panthéon Sorbonne University)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 24th 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: KdVI seminar room F3.20 in Science Park 107
Title: Reinforcement Learning as Meta-induction
Abstract : The meta-inductive justification of induction is usually
regarded as a social learning strategy. But, pre-theoretically,
induction can be justified even for an isolated thinker, incapable of,
or unwilling to engage in, any social interactions. This paper
presents reinforcement learning (RL) as a natural meta-inductive
strategy for such isolated thinkers. The meta-inductive reinforcement
learner learns to choose an optimal prediction method among the
available methods by applying trial and error learning. We use
computer simulations to show that, under plausible assumptions, trial
and error learning indeed leads the thinker to favor induction over
non-inductive predictive methods. Under further plausible assumptions,
the meta-inductive thinker itself is even seen to outperform all
object-level methods. The results are shown to hold true in both
stationary and non-stationary environments.
(This is joint work with Gerhard Schurz.)
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have a joint LIRa and DIP session on Thursday, 24 October 16:30.
To attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
This will be a joint session together with the DIP Colloquium.
Speaker: Igor Douven (IHPST/CNRS/Panthéon Sorbonne University)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 24th 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: KdVI seminar room F3.20 in Science Park 107
Title: Reinforcement Learning as Meta-induction
Abstract. The meta-inductive justification of induction is usually
regarded as a social learning strategy. But, pre-theoretically,
induction can be justified even for an isolated thinker, incapable of,
or unwilling to engage in, any social interactions. This paper
presents reinforcement learning (RL) as a natural meta-inductive
strategy for such isolated thinkers. The meta-inductive reinforcement
learner learns to choose an optimal prediction method among the
available methods by applying trial and error learning. We use
computer simulations to show that, under plausible assumptions, trial
and error learning indeed leads the thinker to favor induction over
non-inductive predictive methods. Under further plausible assumptions,
the meta-inductive thinker itself is even seen to outperform all
object-level methods. The results are shown to hold true in both
stationary and non-stationary environments.
(This is joint work with Gerhard Schurz.)
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 17 October 16:30.
To attend, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Mina Young Pedersen (University of Bergen)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 17th 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: online
Title: Logics of malicious and abnormal behavior in social networks.
Abstract. This talk concerns agents in multi-agent systems who act out
of the ordinary and/or maliciously for their own gain. Analyzing these
types of agents can not only give us valuable information about
agents’ potential power to disrupt, but also about the safety of
systems in which they act. Specifically, I will talk about using modal
logics for social networks to reason about malicious and abnormal
behavior.
I will give an example of such a study where we use a temporal logic
to follow a social network as it evolves through time. We see how one
can use model checking to detect a particular type of agent, namely
social bots, which are computer programs that act like human users on
social media platforms.
The talk is based on joint work with Marija Slavkovik and Sonja Smets.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 17 October 16:30.
To attend, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Mina Young Pedersen (University of Bergen)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 17th 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: online
Title: Logics of malicious and abnormal behavior in social networks.
Abstract. This talk concerns agents in multi-agent systems who act out
of the ordinary and/or maliciously for their own gain. Analyzing these
types of agents can not only give us valuable information about
agents’ potential power to disrupt, but also about the safety of
systems in which they act. Specifically, I will talk about using modal
logics for social networks to reason about malicious and abnormal
behavior.
I will give an example of such a study where we use a temporal logic
to follow a social network as it evolves through time. We see how one
can use model checking to detect a particular type of agent, namely
social bots, which are computer programs that act like human users on
social media platforms.
The talk is based on joint work with Marija Slavkovik and Sonja Smets.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 3 October 16:30.
To attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Giuliano Rosella (University of Turin)
Date and Time: Thursday, October 3rd 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: online
Title: The algebra of Lewis’s counterfactuals and their duality theory
Abstract. The logico-algebraic study of Lewis’s hierarchy of
variably strict conditional logics has been essentially unexplored,
hindering our understanding of their mathematical foundations, and the
connections with other logical systems. This work aims to fill this
gap by providing a comprehensive logico-algebraic analysis of
Lewis’s logics. We begin by introducing novel finite axiomatizations
for varying strengths of Lewis’s logics, distinguishing between
global and local consequence relations on Lewisian sphere models. We
then demonstrate that the global consequence relation is strongly
algebraizable in terms of a specific class of Boolean algebras with a
binary operator representing the counterfactual implication. In
contrast, we show that the local consequence relation is generally not
algebraizable, although it can be characterized as the
degree-preserving logic over the same algebraic models. Further, we
delve into the algebraic semantics of Lewis’s logics, developing two
dual equivalences with respect to particular topological spaces. In
more details, we show a duality with respect to the topological
version of Lewis’s sphere models, and also with respect to Stone
spaces with a selection function; using the latter, we demonstrate the
strong completeness of Lewis’s logics with respect to sphere models.
Finally, we draw some considerations concerning the limit assumption
over sphere models.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team