Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 13 March 16:30.
To attend, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Timo Eckhardt (University College London) and David J. Pym
(University College London & Institute of Philosophy, University
of London)
Date and Time: Thursday, March 13th 2025, 16:30-18:00
Venue: online.
Title: Inferentialist Public Announcement Logics
Abstract. TBA.Beginning with an introduction to proof-theoretic
semantics, which may be seen as a logical realization of
inferentialism, we present a base-extension semantics (B-eS) for
public announcement logics (PAL) as a first step in developing B-eS
for the larger group of dynamic epistemic logics. This is used to
discuss some examples of PAL (including the famous Muddy Children
Puzzle) in order to highlight some insights that an inferential
perspective can give on the role of information in the reasoning
employed.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 6 March 16:30.
To attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Bartosz Więckowski (Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main)
Date and Time: Thursday, March 6th 2025, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC Seminar Room F1.15, Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Proof-Theoretic Considerations on the Structure of Reasoning
with Counterfactuals and Knowledge.
Abstract. Combined reasoning with counterfactuals and knowledge/belief
may involve constructions which:
(i) embed knowledge (relativized to an agent a) in the antecedent
(resp. consequent) of a counterfactual (e.g., 'If a knew that A, a
would believe that B'), or
(ii) prefix knowledge to a counterfactual (e.g., 'a knows that if A
were the case, B would be the case'), or
(iii) do both;
where the embedding and prefixing can be iterated. Counterfactual
inference is typically studied from a model-theoretic perspective. In
this talk, we take a proof-theoretic perspective. We combine
components from [1] and [2], so as to obtain intuitionistic subatomic
natural deduction systems for combined reasoning with ('would'- and
'might'-) counterfactuals and knowledge (resp. belief) which are
proof-theoretically well-behaved (normalization,
subexpression/subformula property, internal completeness) and which
admit the formulation of a semantically autarkic proof-theoretic
semantics for elementary combined constructions of the aforementioned
kinds.
[1] Więckowski, B. (2021). Intuitionistic multi-agent subatomic
natural deduction for belief and knowledge, Journal of Logic and
Computation 31(3): 704-770. Special issue on External and Internal
Calculi for Non-Classical Logics edited by A. Ciabattoni, D. Galmiche,
N. Olivetti, and R. Ramanayake.
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exab013
[2] ---. (2024). Counterfactual assumptions and counterfactual
implications. In Piecha, T. and Wehmeier, K. F., eds., Peter
Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics, Outstanding
Contributions to Logic, Vol. 29, pp. 399-423. Cham, Switzerland:
Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50981-0_15
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team