Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 7 March 16:30.
This will be an online only session. To attend, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Cat Saint-Croix (University of Minnesota, Twin Cities)
Date and Time: Thursday, March 7th 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: Only online.
Title: Standpoint Epistemology for Bayesians
Abstract. It is often supposed that feminist and formal epistemologies
stand in opposition to one another. But, this is not so, at least when
it comes to Standpoint Epistemology and Bayesian Epistemology. In
fact, these two are particularly compatible. I begin by showing that
Bayesian Epistemology is not among the usual “targets” of
Standpoint Epistemology. Toole (2022) “Demarginalizing Standpoint
Epistemology” characterizes these targets as aperspectival and
atomistic, neither of which is true of Bayesian approaches.
Furthermore, when we consider the convergence theorems—a traditional
argument in favor of Bayesian Epistemology—the need for Standpoint
Epistemology becomes clear: Bayesians cannot begin to satisfy the
conditions necessary for convergence without taking the observations
and recommendations of Standpoint Epistemology into account.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 7 March 16:30.
This will be an online only session. To attend, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Cat Saint-Croix (University of Minnesota, Twin Cities)
Date and Time: Thursday, March 7th 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: Only online.
Title: Standpoint Epistemology for Bayesians
Abstract. It is often supposed that feminist and formal epistemologies
stand in opposition to one another. But, this is not so, at least when
it comes to Standpoint Epistemology and Bayesian Epistemology. In
fact, these two are particularly compatible. I begin by showing that
Bayesian Epistemology is not among the usual “targets” of
Standpoint Epistemology. Toole (2022) “Demarginalizing Standpoint
Epistemology” characterizes these targets as aperspectival and
atomistic, neither of which is true of Bayesian approaches.
Furthermore, when we consider the convergence theorems—a traditional
argument in favor of Bayesian Epistemology—the need for Standpoint
Epistemology becomes clear: Bayesians cannot begin to satisfy the
conditions necessary for convergence without taking the observations
and recommendations of Standpoint Epistemology into account.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 22
February 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online,
please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Chenwei Shi (Tsinghua University)
Date and Time: Thursday, February 22nd 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Reasoning about Dependence, Preference and Coalitional
Power
Abstract: Dependence, preference and coalitional power are three
key
concepts in game theory. There have been lots of logics for
reasoning
about each of these three notions. Still in want is a unified
logical
analysis. Baltag and van Benthem’s recent work [1] provides a
simple
but powerful framework (LFD) for reasoning about functional
dependence. The framework is so natural for modeling games in
strategic form that it yearns for the inclusion of preference
relations. Therefore, by extending LFD with preference relations,
we
provide a logic which characterizes the interaction between
dependence, preference and coalitional power. By making the role
of
dependence explicit, our logical analysis leads to a unified view
of
several key concepts in not only non-cooperative but also
cooperative
game theory, namely Nash equilibrium, Pareto optimality and the
core.
This talk is based on the joint work [2] with Chen Qian and Yiyan
Wang.
[1] Baltag, A., van Benthem, J.: A simple logic of functional
dependence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 50, 939-1005 (2021).
[2] Chen, Q., Shi, C. and Wang, Y.: Reasoning about Dependence,
Preference and Coalitional Power, Journal of Philosophical Logic
53,
99-130 (2024).
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 22 February 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Chenwei Shi (Tsinghua University)
Date and Time: Thursday, February 22nd 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Reasoning about Dependence, Preference and Coalitional Power
Abstract: Dependence, preference and coalitional power are three key
concepts in game theory. There have been lots of logics for reasoning
about each of these three notions. Still in want is a unified logical
analysis. Baltag and van Benthem’s recent work [1] provides a simple
but powerful framework (LFD) for reasoning about functional
dependence. The framework is so natural for modeling games in
strategic form that it yearns for the inclusion of preference
relations. Therefore, by extending LFD with preference relations, we
provide a logic which characterizes the interaction between
dependence, preference and coalitional power. By making the role of
dependence explicit, our logical analysis leads to a unified view of
several key concepts in not only non-cooperative but also cooperative
game theory, namely Nash equilibrium, Pareto optimality and the core.
This talk is based on the joint work [2] with Chen Qian and Yiyan
Wang.
[1] Baltag, A., van Benthem, J.: A simple logic of functional
dependence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 50, 939-1005 (2021).
[2] Chen, Q., Shi, C. and Wang, Y.: Reasoning about Dependence,
Preference and Coalitional Power, Journal of Philosophical Logic 53,
99-130 (2024).
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 22 February 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Chenwei Shi (Tsinghua University)
Date and Time: Thursday, February 22nd 2024, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Reasoning about Dependence, Preference and Coalitional Power
Abstract: Dependence, preference and coalitional power are three key
concepts in game theory. There have been lots of logics for reasoning
about each of these three notions. Still in want is a unified logical
analysis. Baltag and van Benthem’s recent work [1] provides a simple
but powerful framework (LFD) for reasoning about functional
dependence. The framework is so natural for modeling games in
strategic form that it yearns for the inclusion of preference
relations. Therefore, by extending LFD with preference relations, we
provide a logic which characterizes the interaction between
dependence, preference and coalitional power. By making the role of
dependence explicit, our logical analysis leads to a unified view of
several key concepts in not only non-cooperative but also cooperative
game theory, namely Nash equilibrium, Pareto optimality and the core.
This talk is based on the joint work [2] with Chen Qian and Yiyan
Wang.
[1] Baltag, A., van Benthem, J.: A simple logic of functional
dependence. Journal of Philosophical Logic 50, 939-1005 (2021).
[2] Chen, Q., Shi, C. and Wang, Y.: Reasoning about Dependence,
Preference and Coalitional Power, Journal of Philosophical Logic 53,
99-130 (2024).
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have a joint NiHil and LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 1 February 15:10, Room F0.01, Bushuis in Kloveniersburgwal 48.
NOTE the unusual time and location.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use NiHiL seminar Zoom link: https://uva-live.zoom.us/s/87618965843
NOTE: this is NOT a usual LIRa Zoom link, as it was stated in the previous mail. Sorry for the confusion.
You can find the details of the talk below.
This will be a joint session together with the NihiL seminar, as a
part of NiHiL workshop.
Speaker: Hannes Leitgeb (Münich)
Title: The Logic of Theoretical Reasons. An Axiomatic Account
Date and Time: Thursday, 1 February, 15:10-16:10
Venue: Room F0.01, Bushuis in Kloveniersburgwal 48 or virtually via
Zoom at https://uva-live.zoom.us/s/87618965843.
Abstract: the talk argues for a system of axioms and definitions that
is meant to capture the logic of theoretical reasons, that is, of
reasons for belief. The system concerns a primitive direct-reason-for
relation, a defined inferential-reason-for relation, an identity
criterion for reasons, a primitive aggregation function for reasons,
and a primitive function for the revision of belief by reasons.
Reasons are assumed to speak for propositions with numerical
strengths, the aggregation of reasons involves intersections of
propositions and sums of strengths, belief is reconstructed as
subjective probability, and ratios of new-to-old-odds are postulated
to be a function of strengths of reason. The resulting theory avoids
problems that have been ascribed to the additive aggregation of
reasons, it entails that reasons conform to a vector structure and
that the impact of a reason on belief corresponds to a probabilistic
Jeffrey-Field-update, and although the theory differs from existing
logics of reason, it is partially continuous with two of them.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 1 February 15:10.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
This will be a joint session together with the NihiL seminar, as a
part of NiHiL workshop.
Speaker: Hannes Leitgeb (Münich)
Title: The Logic of Theoretical Reasons. An Axiomatic Account
Date and Time: Thursday, 1 February, 15:10-16:10
Venue: Room F0.01, Bushuis in Kloveniersburgwal 48 or virtually via
Zoom at https://uva-live.zoom.us/s/87618965843.
Abstract: the talk argues for a system of axioms and definitions that
is meant to capture the logic of theoretical reasons, that is, of
reasons for belief. The system concerns a primitive direct-reason-for
relation, a defined inferential-reason-for relation, an identity
criterion for reasons, a primitive aggregation function for reasons,
and a primitive function for the revision of belief by reasons.
Reasons are assumed to speak for propositions with numerical
strengths, the aggregation of reasons involves intersections of
propositions and sums of strengths, belief is reconstructed as
subjective probability, and ratios of new-to-old-odds are postulated
to be a function of strengths of reason. The resulting theory avoids
problems that have been ascribed to the additive aggregation of
reasons, it entails that reasons conform to a vector structure and
that the impact of a reason on belief corresponds to a probabilistic
Jeffrey-Field-update, and although the theory differs from existing
logics of reason, it is partially continuous with two of them.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 14 December 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Andreas Herzig (LILaC, IRIT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse)
Date and Time: Thursday, December 14th 2023, 16:30-18:00
Venue: Online only (not hybrid)
Title: Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments and its Properties
Abstract. Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA) is a
variant of PDL whose atomic programs are assignments of propositional
variables. It provides an interesting framework for knowledge
representation. Its mathematical properties differ from PDL:
satisfiability and model checking are both PSPACE-complete. These
results follow from the close relation of DL-PA with quantified
boolean formulas, coming with expressivity and succinctness results.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 14 December 16:30.
This will be an online session. Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Andreas Herzig (LILaC, IRIT, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse)
Date and Time: Thursday, December 14th 2023, 16:30-18:00
Venue: Online only (not hybrid)
Title: Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments and its Properties
Abstract. Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA) is a
variant of PDL whose atomic programs are assignments of propositional
variables. It provides an interesting framework for knowledge
representation. Its mathematical properties differ from PDL:
satisfiability and model checking are both PSPACE-complete. These
results follow from the close relation of DL-PA with quantified
boolean formulas, coming with expressivity and succinctness results.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We would like to draw your attention to the
***Annual VvL Seminar 2023***
The second edition of the (in-person) Annual VvL Seminar will be
organized by Utrecht University. The event is inspired by the
departmental logic seminars that are organized at each university, and
aims to unify the universities for a collaborative seminar. Besides
hosting a main speaker, the seminar will also be the location of the
award ceremony of the VvL MSc Thesis Prize winners, who will give a
short presentation of their thesis. The details of the event can be
found below, as well as on the VvL website
https://verenigingvoorlogica.nl/en/Activiteiten/VvL-Joint-Seminar/
*Main speaker*: Natasha Alechina
*MSc Thesis Prize winners*: Rodrigo Almeida (supervisors: Nick
Bezhanishvili and Tommaso Moraschini), Søren Brinck Knudstorp
(supervisors: Johan van Benthem and Nick Bezhanishvili), Raoul
Koudijs (supervisor: Balder ten Cate)
*Date & time*: December 8, 2023, 14:30-17:30
*Location*: The Sweelinckzaal at Drift 21, room 0.05, Utrecht. For
visitors from outside the UU, please go to the university library at
Drift 27 and proceed through the lobby to the back exit to reach the
other Drift buildings.
*Local organizers*: Colin Caret & Johannes Korbmacher
*PROGRAM*
14:30-14:40 Opening and Welcome Remarks
14:40-14:50 Brief Presentation on the work of the VvL
14:50-15:50 VvL lecture by Natasha Alechina
15:50-16:10 Coffee Break
16:10-16:20 Remarks by the VvL Master thesis awards committee
16:20-17:20 MSc Thesis Prize presentations (3x20mins)
17:20-17:30 Award Ceremony and Closing Remarks
*REGISTRATION*
There is no cost for attending the seminar, but to help with
organization, please register your attendance using the online form
linked below. An optional dinner will follow the event in the
Westerdijkkamer of the Academiegebouw (42 euros per person). If you
would like to join for dinner you may indicate this in the
registration form.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1_8knDUMzOASuNY8VYavLayDg8DZLKHoHzO7B0_3A1e…
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team