Dear all,
Unfortunately the LIRa session this Thursday 9 February is cancelled.
The talk by Erman Acar has been rescheduled to a later date.
Our next session will be on Thursday 16 February with Jos Baeten.
kind regards,
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 9 February 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Erman Acar (ILLC & IvI, University of Amsterdam)
Date and Time: Thursday, February 9th 2023, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: A Canvas on Integrating Learning & Reasoning
Abstract. Integrating learning and reasoning is one of the major
current challenges in AI research, and becoming more frequently
pronounced under the name called "neuro-symbolic AI". Logic definitely
has an important part in this research direction. In this talk, I will
give a brief summary about the field, and the state of the art, as
well as my work including differentiable logics, and methods on
embedding the background logic. I will also outline some of the
pitfalls and the current challenges in making the logical inference a
part of the new learning algorithms.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 2 February.
Please note the UNUSUAL TIME of 14:00 (Amsterdam time)
and that this will be an ONLINE ONLY session.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Jialiang Yan
Date and Time: Thursday, February 2nd 2023, 14:00-15:30
(NOTE the unusual time, earlier than usual)
Venue: fully online. (i.e. not hybrid)
Title: Knowing and believing an epistemic possibility
Abstract. What does it mean to know or believe that something might be
the case? In this talk, we address the issue focusing on the epistemic
possibility expressed by English might when embedded under the
propositional attitude verbs know and believe. We present some puzzles
to highlight the challenges arising from such know-might and
believe-might sentences. We propose a framework to solve the puzzles,
in which epistemic might is defined as quantifying over the epistemic
possibilities in an information state, and belief is formalized in
term of a plausibility ordering. In contrast to the classical
epistemic logic, the factivity of knowledge is treated as a
presupposition rather than being solely dependent on the reflexivity
of the accessibility relation. All analyses are implemented in a
team-based modal logic BSEL, an epistemic variant of Aloni’s (2022)
BSML.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will resume our LIRa sessions in 2023 with our
first talk next week, on Thursday, 2 February.
Please note the UNUSUAL TIME of 14:00 (Amsterdam time)
and that this will be an ONLINE ONLY session.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Jialiang Yan
Date and Time: Thursday, February 2nd 2023, 14:00-15:30
(NOTE the unusual time, earlier than usual)
Venue: fully online. (i.e. not hybrid, zoom only)
Title: Knowing and believing an epistemic possibility
Abstract. What does it mean to know or believe that something
might be the case? In this talk, we address the issue focusing on
the epistemic possibility expressed by English might when embedded
under the propositional attitude verbs know and believe. We
present some puzzles
to highlight the challenges arising from such know-might and
believe-might sentences. We propose a framework to solve the
puzzles, in which epistemic might is defined as quantifying over
the epistemic possibilities in an information state, and belief is
formalized in term of a plausibility ordering. In contrast to the
classical epistemic logic, the factivity of knowledge is treated
as a presupposition rather than being solely dependent on the
reflexivity of the accessibility relation. All analyses are
implemented in a team-based modal logic BSEL, an epistemic variant
of Aloni’s (2022) BSML.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 15 December 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session with the speaker present on location.
If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Fan Yang (Utrecht University)
Date and Time: Thursday, December 15th 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Generalizing propositional team semantics
Abstract. In this talk, we discuss a generalization of the standard
team semantics in the propositional logic context. Team semantics was
introduced by Hodges (1997) and later advanced by Väänänen (2007)
in dependence logic. Propositional dependence logic (studied in (Yang
& Väänänen 2016)) is an extension of (classical) propositional
logic with a new type of atomic formulas, called dependence atoms, to
express the (functional) dependencies between propositions. The key
idea of team semantics is that such dependency properties can only
make sense in multitudes. A formula in such a logic is thus evaluated
on a set of valuations or possible worlds (called teams). Dependence
atoms correspond exactly to functional dependencies studied in
database theory; in particular, these atoms satisfy Armstrong’s
Axioms (1974), which completely axiomatize the implication problem of
functional dependencies. The same type of team semantics was also
independently adopted in inquisitive logic (Ciardelli & Roelofsen
2011).
Essentially, team semantics is defined over an underlying powerset
(Kripke) frame of the teams, which also forms a bounded
join-semilattice. Several authors ((Puncochar 2016 &
2017),(Holliday 2020),(Dmitrieva 2021),(Bezhanishvili & Yang
2022)) have recently defined different generalizations of the standard
team semantics by modifying this powerset structure from different
perspectives. In this talk, we propose a new definition of team
semantics that tries to combine the approaches of (Puncochar
2017),(Dmitrieva 2021),(Bezhanishvili & Yang 2022) and also
preserve the key original idea of Hodges (1997). We define a team
(Kripke) frame simply as an arbitrary bounded join-semilattice
satisfying certain conditions. The semantics for connectives and
constants are generalized in a natural manner. The dependence atoms in
this generalized setting still satisfy Armstrong’s Axioms of
functional dependencies.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 15 December 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session with the speaker on location.
If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Fan Yang (Utrecht University)
Date and Time: Thursday, December 15th 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Generalizing propositional team semantics
Abstract. In this talk, we discuss a generalization of the standard
team semantics in the propositional logic context. Team semantics was
introduced by Hodges (1997) and later advanced by Väänänen (2007)
in dependence logic. Propositional dependence logic (studied in (Yang
& Väänänen 2016)) is an extension of (classical) propositional
logic with a new type of atomic formulas, called dependence atoms, to
express the (functional) dependencies between propositions. The key
idea of team semantics is that such dependency properties can only
make sense in multitudes. A formula in such a logic is thus evaluated
on a set of valuations or possible worlds (called teams). Dependence
atoms correspond exactly to functional dependencies studied in
database theory; in particular, these atoms satisfy Armstrong’s
Axioms (1974), which completely axiomatize the implication problem of
functional dependencies. The same type of team semantics was also
independently adopted in inquisitive logic (Ciardelli & Roelofsen
2011).
Essentially, team semantics is defined over an underlying powerset
(Kripke) frame of the teams, which also forms a bounded
join-semilattice. Several authors ((Puncochar 2016 &
2017),(Holliday 2020),(Dmitrieva 2021),(Bezhanishvili & Yang
2022)) have recently defined different generalizations of the standard
team semantics by modifying this powerset structure from different
perspectives. In this talk, we propose a new definition of team
semantics that tries to combine the approaches of (Puncochar
2017),(Dmitrieva 2021),(Bezhanishvili & Yang 2022) and also
preserve the key original idea of Hodges (1997). We define a team
(Kripke) frame simply as an arbitrary bounded join-semilattice
satisfying certain conditions. The semantics for connectives and
constants are generalized in a natural manner. The dependence atoms in
this generalized setting still satisfy Armstrong’s Axioms of
functional dependencies.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
Tomorrow you are invited to the joint seminar organised by VvL and the logic seminars of the Netherlands. There will be no regular LIRa session.
The Dutch Association for Logic and Philosophy of the Exact Sciences (VvL) will hold an annual in-person joint seminar organized by the University of Groningen. The event is inspired by the departmental logic seminars that are organized at each university, and aims to unify the universities for a collaborative seminar. Besides hosting a main speaker, the seminar will also be the location of the award ceremony of the VvL MSc Thesis Prize winners, who will give a short presentation of their thesis.
For more information, see the GroLog website here:
https://sites.google.com/rug.nl/grolog/home
In particular please note that you should register to attend the event via this form before 5 December:
https://forms.gle/5EYXwK6eh3uy5naAA
The event will be fully on location, with no hybrid or online participation.
Date and time: Thursday, December 8th 2022, 15:00-17:00
Location: Jantina Tammeszaal, in the University Library in the centre,
Broerstraat 4, 9712 CP Groningen.
Title: The Annual VvL Seminar 2022
Speakers:
Invited talk:
- Sonja Smets (ILLC, University of Amsterdam)
MSc Thesis Prize winners:
- Anna Dmitrieva (supervisors: Nick Bezhanishvili & Tommaso
Moraschini),
- Maximilian Siemers (supervisor: Aybüke Özgün),
- Dominik Wehr (supervisor: Bahareh Afshari)
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
Next week you are invited to the joint seminar organised by VvL and the logic seminars of the Netherlands. There will be no regular LIRa session.
The Dutch Association for Logic and Philosophy of the Exact Sciences (VvL) will hold an annual in-person joint seminar organized by the University of Groningen. The event is inspired by the departmental logic seminars that are organized at each university, and aims to unify the universities for a collaborative seminar. Besides hosting a main speaker, the seminar will also be the location of the award ceremony of the VvL MSc Thesis Prize winners, who will give a short presentation of their thesis.
For more information, see the GroLog website here:
https://sites.google.com/rug.nl/grolog/home
In particular please note that you should register to attend the event via this form before 5 December:
https://forms.gle/5EYXwK6eh3uy5naAA
The event will be fully on location, with no hybrid or online participation.
Date and time: Thursday, December 8th 2022, 15:00-17:00
Location: Jantina Tammeszaal, in the University Library in the centre,
Broerstraat 4, 9712 CP Groningen.
Title: The Annual VvL Seminar 2022
Speakers:
Invited talk:
- Sonja Smets (ILLC, University of Amsterdam)
MSc Thesis Prize winners:
- Anna Dmitrieva (supervisors: Nick Bezhanishvili & Tommaso
Moraschini),
- Maximilian Siemers (supervisor: Aybüke Özgün),
- Dominik Wehr (supervisor: Bahareh Afshari)
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 1 December 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session, with the speakers present on location.
If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speakers: Peter van Emde Boas (ILLC, FNWI, UvA (retired)) & Ghica
van Emde Boas–Lubsen (independent scholar)
Date and Time: Thursday, December 1st 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Analyzing the Logic of Sun Tzu in “The Art of War”, Using
Mind Maps
Abstract. The title of the talk coincides with the title of our book
which appeared recently with Springer in the Logic in Asia series,
coauthored by Kaibo Xie and Bonan Zhao, both past students at our
institute.
This book (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6250-9) presents a
bi-lingual version of the text of this 2500 years old treatise on
Chinese strategy (English, derived from the Giles translation from
1910, and the Chinese source). But the book presents it in an unusual
way, using so-called Text Tree Mindmaps. This representation enables
us (but also the reader) to obtain direct access to the logic and
reasoning patterns of Sun Tzu. Other editions, which are more focused
on historical, military, cultural or linguistic aspects (aside of the
various books which study Sun Tzu in the context of business strategy)
have not aimed at representing and preserving the logical structure of
the text. In order to do this we had to modify the Giles translation
at several points.
Logic in this context has little to do with what is considered to be
logic in the sense studied at ILLC; it refers to the structural
patterns which frequently appear in the text. Our book presents a full
inventory of the occurrences of these patterns found in the text.
Moreover, in the introductory sections of the book we pay attention to
connections with logic and game theory; (this was the topic of our
initial research for the forthcoming handbook of the history of
logical thought in China.)
If time permits we may also illustrates the relevance of the teachings
of Sun Tzu for understanding the developments of warfare in our era.
We can illustrate this by the examples from the battle at Gettysburg
during the American Civil War in 1863, or on the current War in
Ukraine.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 1 December 16:30.
This will be a hybrid session. If you want to attend online, please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/89230639823?pwd=YWJuSnJmTDhXcWhmd1ZkeG5zb0o5UT09
(Meeting ID: 892 3063 9823, Passcode: 421723)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speakers: Peter van Emde Boas (ILLC, FNWI, UvA (retired)) & Ghica
van Emde Boas–Lubsen (independent scholar)
Date and Time: Thursday, December 1st 2022, 16:30-18:00
Venue: ILLC seminar room F1.15 in Science Park 107 and online.
Title: Analyzing the Logic of Sun Tzu in “The Art of War”, Using Mind Maps
Abstract. The title of the talk coincides with the title of our book
which appeared recently with Springer in the Logic in Asia series,
coauthored by Kaibo Xie and Bonan Zhao, both past students at our
institute.
This book (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6250-9) presents a
bi-lingual version of the text of this 2500 years old treatise on
Chinese strategy (English, derived from the Giles translation from
1910, and the Chinese source). But the book presents it in an unusual
way, using so-called Text Tree Mindmaps. This representation enables
us (but also the reader) to obtain direct access to the logic and
reasoning patterns of Sun Tzu. Other editions, which are more focused
on historical, military, cultural or linguistic aspects (aside of the
various books which study Sun Tzu in the context of business strategy)
have not aimed at representing and preserving the logical structure of
the text. In order to do this we had to modify the Giles translation
at several points.
Logic in this context has little to do with what is considered to be
logic in the sense studied at ILLC; it refers to the structural
patterns which frequently appear in the text. Our book presents a full
inventory of the occurrences of these patterns found in the text.
Moreover, in the introductory sections of the book we pay attention to
connections with logic and game theory; (this was the topic of our
initial research for the forthcoming handbook of the history of
logical thought in China.)
If time permits we may also illustrates the relevance of the teachings
of Sun Tzu for understanding the developments of warfare in our era.
We can illustrate this by the examples from the battle at Gettysburg
during the American Civil War in 1863, or on the current War in
Ukraine.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team