Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 9 December 16:30.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Giorgio Sbardolini
Date and Time: Thursday, December 9th 2021, 16:30-18:00,
Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Coordination without Common Knowledge
Abstract. It is fairly well understood how rational agents coordinate
by means of common knowledge. At least occasionally, we are rational,
and we coordinate. Even so, often it doesn’t seem that we coordinate
by reasoning about what we both know (and we know that we know and so
on). Sometimes we coordinate without common knowledge, but how? I’ll
present some work in progress in which I try to make sense of a weak
notion of rationality on which coordination without common knowledge
is rational. I will present two (tentative) ways of making sense of
this idea: one using Iterated Best Response reasoning and one using
Dynamic Epistemic Actions. The two approaches are not equivalent, and
I’m also interested in what connections there might be between these
two ways of studying rational action.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
The following LIRa related talk might be of interest to some of you:
This Thursday, the 2nd of December at 11am we have a DIEP seminar by Tomas Veloz (Centre Leo Apostel):
Title: Reaction Networks and Evolutionary Game Theory
Abstract: Mathematical approaches in systems biology are increasingly applied beyond the scope of biology. Particularly, reaction networks have been suggested as an alternative way to model systems of a general kind, and particularly social phenomena. In this latter “socio-chemical metaphor” molecular species play the role of agents’ decisions and their outcomes, and chemical reactions play the role of interactions among these decisions. From here, it is possible to study the dynamical properties of social systems using standard tools of biochemical modelling. In this talk we show how reaction networks can model systems that are usually studied via evolutionary game theory. We illustrate our framework by modeling the repeated prisoners’ dilemma. We further develop a model considering the interaction among Tit for Tat and Defector agents.
We will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the approach as well as its potential to produce new insights in classical problems such as the emergence of goal-directedness and the evolution of cooperation.
Zoom link: https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/85608909905
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 2 December 16:30.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Adam Brandenburger
Date and Time: Thursday, December 2nd 2021, 16:30-18:00, Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Agreement and Disagreement in a Non-Classical World
Abstract.
The Agreement Theorem (Aumann, 1976) states that if two Bayesian
agents start with a common prior, then they cannot have common
knowledge that they hold different posterior probabilities of some
underlying event of interest. In short, the two agents cannot "agree
to disagree." This result applies in the classical domain where
classical probability theory applies. But in non-classical domains
(such as the quantum world), classical probability theory does not
apply, and so we cannot assume that the same result holds when agents
observe non-classical phenomena. Inspired by their use in quantum
mechanics, we employ signed probability measures
("quasi-probabilities") to investigate the epistemics of the
non-classical world and ask, in particular: What conditions lead to
agreement or allow for disagreement when agents may use signed
probabilities?
by Adam Brandenburger, Patricia Contreras-Tejada, Pierfrancesco La
Mura, Giannicola Scarpa, and Kai Steverson
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
The following virtual event might be of interest to the LIRa audience:
This Thursday, Dec 2, 14.00-15.00 (Amsterdam time), Anthia Solaki and Chris Starke will be discussing "How to tame an evil AI" with Iyad Rahwan, the director of the Center for Humans and Machines of the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. If you are interested in attending the zoom meeting, please, register here:
https://humane-ai.nl/events_report/9-humane-conversations-how-to-tame-an-ev…
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 25 November 16:30.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Catholijn Jonker (Delft University of Technology)
Date and Time: Thursday, November 25th 2021, 16:30-18:00,
Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Revisiting Computational Fragments of Logic and Meta-Reasoning:
the DESIRE framework
Abstract.
I will discuss how bi-modular logics of a simple kind can be used to
perform abstract meta-level forms of reasoning.
I don’t know if I can get the old DESIRE system running again for
you, but I will give it a try. Otherwise I will explain the concept to
you in detail. Showing how you can use meta-level reasoning for
Diagnostic Reasoning and for reasoning about the Closed World
Assumption in a different way. I will reflect on this to show how this
reasoning could help in modern day I to have systems realise what it
is that they don’t know about.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session tomorrow, on Thursday, 18 November 17:00.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Sebastian De Haro
Date and Time: Thursday, November 18th 2021, 17:00-18:30,
Amsterdam time.
(Please NOTE that we start half an hour later than usual!)
Venue: online.
Title: Visualization and Understanding in Physics
Abstract.
The discussion about visualization and its relation to scientific
understanding goes back to the early days of quantum mechanics, when
Erwin Schrödinger and Werner Heisenberg each used 'Anschaulichkeit'
to defend his own preferred version of quantum theory. After reviewing
this history, I will discuss scientific understanding for current
theories of quantum gravity, where spacetime is sometimes claimed to
have no straightforward of natural visualization. I will end with a
number of open issues vis-à-vis emerging (quantum) technologies.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
Please note that the time mentioned in our previous announcement is no longer correct.
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 18 November 17:00.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Sebastian De Haro
Date and Time: Thursday, November 18th 2021, 17:00-18:30,
(half an hour later than usual!) Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Visualization and Understanding in Physics
Abstract.
The discussion about visualization and its relation to scientific
understanding goes back to the early days of quantum mechanics, when
Erwin Schrödinger and Werner Heisenberg each used 'Anschaulichkeit'
to defend his own preferred version of quantum theory. After reviewing
this history, I will discuss scientific understanding for current
theories of quantum gravity, where spacetime is sometimes claimed to
have no straightforward of natural visualization. I will end with a
number of open issues vis-à-vis emerging (quantum) technologies.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session on Thursday, 18 November 16:30.
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Sebastian De Haro
Date and Time: Thursday, November 18th 2021, 16:30-18:00,
Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Visualization and Understanding in Physics
Abstract.
The discussion about visualization and its relation to scientific
understanding goes back to the early days of quantum mechanics, when
Erwin Schrödinger and Werner Heisenberg each used 'Anschaulichkeit'
to defend his own preferred version of quantum theory. After reviewing
this history, I will discuss scientific understanding for current
theories of quantum gravity, where spacetime is sometimes claimed to
have no straightforward of natural visualization. I will end with a
number of open issues vis-à-vis emerging (quantum) technologies.
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have a joint LIRa—A|C session tomorrow, on Thursday, 11 November 15:30.
NOTE that we start one hour earlier than usual!
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Yanjing Wang (Peking University)
Date and Time: Thursday, November 11th 2021, 15:30-17:00,
Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Intuitionistic logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how
Abstract.
In this talk, we propose a general method to "decode" (propositional)
intuitionistic logic and various intermediate logics as (dynamic)
epistemic logics of knowing how. Our approach is inspired by some
scattered ideas hidden in the vast literature of math, philosophy, CS,
and linguistics about intuitionistic logic in the past 100 years,
which echoed Heyting's initial (but forgotten?) conception about
intuitionistic truth as "knowing how to prove". The core technical
idea is to use a bundled know-how modality to unify the formalized
Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation and the Kripke semantics
of intuitionistic logic. As we will see, this approach can reveal the
hidden complicated dynamic-epistemic information behind the
innocent-looking connectives but makes intuitionistic logic intuitive.
With the natural but precise epistemic readings of intuitionistic
formulas, various technical results about intuitionistic logic and
intermediate logics become transparent, if not trivial. If time
permits, we show how to decode inquisitive logic and some version of
dependence logic as epistemic logics in order to demonstrate the power
of this general approach, which could also be a meeting point of
various research themes at ILLC.
(The talk is partly based on the joint work with Haoyu Wang and
Yunsong Wang)
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team
Dear all,
We will have our next LIRa session together with the A|C seminar on Thursday, 11 November 15:30.
NOTE: Instead of our usual time slot we will start one hour earlier!
Please use our recurring zoom link:
https://uva-live.zoom.us/j/88142993494?pwd=d1BsQWR4T2UyK0Job29YNThjaGRkUT09
(Meeting ID: 881 4299 3494, Passcode: 352984)
You can find the details of the talk below.
Speaker: Yanjing Wang (Peking University)
Date and Time: Thursday, November 11th 2021, 15:30-17:00,
Amsterdam time.
Venue: online.
Title: Intuitionistic logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how
Abstract.
In this talk, we propose a general method to "decode" (propositional)
intuitionistic logic and various intermediate logics as (dynamic)
epistemic logics of knowing how. Our approach is inspired by some
scattered ideas hidden in the vast literature of math, philosophy, CS,
and linguistics about intuitionistic logic in the past 100 years,
which echoed Heyting's initial (but forgotten?) conception about
intuitionistic truth as "knowing how to prove". The core technical
idea is to use a bundled know-how modality to unify the formalized
Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation and the Kripke semantics
of intuitionistic logic. As we will see, this approach can reveal the
hidden complicated dynamic-epistemic information behind the
innocent-looking connectives but makes intuitionistic logic intuitive.
With the natural but precise epistemic readings of intuitionistic
formulas, various technical results about intuitionistic logic and
intermediate logics become transparent, if not trivial. If time
permits, we show how to decode inquisitive logic and some version of
dependence logic as epistemic logics in order to demonstrate the power
of this general approach, which could also be a meeting point of
various research themes at ILLC.
(The talk is partly based on the joint work with Haoyu Wang and
Yunsong Wang)
Hope to see you there!
The LIRa team